The FBI Considers the IRS and DOJ, Domestic Terrorists

 

Eventually it was bound to happen.  The ever increasing ambiguous laws that allow the government to prosecute, or worse, simply negate all Constitutional protections of its citizens would come back to hang them.  In an unusual circumstance, what is essentially one party in D.C. when it comes to matters of covering up governmental criminality, has split into a two party system.  Specifically, a sect of the Republican party known as Tea Partiers pushed unrelentingly to expose the criminality acted upon members of its own tribe by various government agencies.

The Tea Party was formed by a group of individuals around the country who wanted to get back to the ideals of the Constitution i.e freedom.  But the Constitution is kryptonite to the system.  And so those who organize to promote the Constitution were targeted by the highest levels of government.  What better weapon to attack those whose intention is to defend the Constitution than an unconstitutional agency that has essentially unquestioned authority.  After all it is always unclear who watches the watchman.  Well in this particular case, the FBI and DOJ would seem to have jurisdiction over actions consistent with those of the IRS.

Under the FBI’s own definition of a ‘Domestic Terrorist’ one MUST consider the IRS to be a terrorist organization as evidenced by the very recent discoveries surrounding the IRS’s own actions.

“Domestic terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
  • Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
  • Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. …”

While the first characteristic seems to imply violence is necessary it should be noted that under the FBI’s definition of ‘International Terrorism’ they explicitly include ‘Violent acts’ within the definition.

“International terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
  • Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
  • Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.*

The distinction of violence within the international but not domestic definition is surely not an oversight.  But by doing so it leaves open the opportunity to define a non violent act to be construed as indirectly dangerous to human life (e.g. Snowden’s actions).  But certainly wrongfully putting someone inside a federal prison for tax evasion would be considered dangerous to human life.  According to the following revelations through emails obtained via court orders by Judicial Watch (a nonpartisan government watchdog), that is exactly what the IRS, DOJ and FBI were conspiring to do.

“These new documents show that the Obama IRS scandal is also an Obama DOJ and FBI scandal,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The FBI and Justice Department worked with Lois Lerner and the IRS to concoct some reason to put President Obama’s opponents in jail before his reelection. And this abuse resulted in the FBI’s illegally obtaining confidential taxpayer information. How can the Justice Department and FBI investigate the very scandal in which they are implicated?”

On April 16, 2014, Judicial Watch forced the IRS to release documents revealing for the first time that Lerner communicated with the DOJ in May 2013 about whether it was possible to launch criminal prosecutions against targeted tax-exempt entities. The documents were obtained due to court order in an October 2013 Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the IRS.

Those documents contained an email exchange between Lerner and Nikole C. Flax, then-chief of staff to then-Acting IRS Commissioner Steven T. Miller discussing plans to work with the DOJ to prosecute nonprofit groups that “lied” (Lerner’s quotation marks) about political activities…”

But it begs the question then again, if the DOJ and FBI are also implicated in the domestic terrorism (according to the FBI’s own definition) who is left to prosecute?

Well it is we the people.  It shouldn’t matter if you are Democrat or Republican.  We have a clear and identifiable gross abuse of government at the highest levels.  The abuse falls under the FBI’s own definition of domestic terrorism, a definition they would not hesitate to use against you or your family if it suited their objectives.  And so call it the Golden Rule or Kantian Categorical Imperatives or simple justice, but it is imperative to the people’s rule over its representative governing body to prosecute all involved to the highest levels and to the maximum penalty of the law.

The abuse by those who have been granted incredible powers under the trust of the nation need to be dealt the most severe consequences.  Our very response to this matter will underpin the relationship between the people and its government for generations.  If we allow such astonishing government abuses, which have now been overtly evidenced and confessed by at least some of the guilty parties, to be lightly dealt with then we blatantly fail to defend every subsequent generation of Americans from ever worse abuses.  We fail as Americans.  The result of this investigation over the coming months will likely show that we the people have lost all sense of what it means to be an American.  That said, I remain doubtingly hopeful that I am proven wrong.

20 thoughts on “The FBI Considers the IRS and DOJ, Domestic Terrorists

  1. I hear that the U.S. marshals don’t report to the corporate DOJ.
    This may be our only hope for I hear 70 percent of them want to follow the organic constitution and do their job to protect the rights of the people of America.
    The other 30 percent I hear take bribes and are helping to keep the fascist corporate state in power. They say this is going to change soon. We can only hope.
    I keep hearing arrest will come as soon as they are given warrants by constitutional
    Law abiding judges or perhaps mandates directly from the people themselves.

  2. IRS budget cuts are a good thing. Eventually those nasty Nazis that work at your local office, like Edison NJ for example, will be closed.
    Hopefully all will be closed and abolished in the very near future.

  3. So, exactly how can the people prosecute their governing representatives if the FBI and DOJ are as guilty as the governing representatives?

    1. You could vote them out! Oh wait…top officials of the alphabet soup groups are all hand-picked and approved by the pres and congress.

      You could fire people! Oh wait…top officials of the alphabet soup groups may ensure the minions get shuffled around for “disciplinary” action instead of firing; gotta keep those “yes sir” folks around. You lose.

      To summarize: you can’t stop the spread of the gangrene. Cheers!

    2. A couple thoughts come to mind, neither very pretty but suspect it’s time… Without term limits and nearly unlimited “grafting” funds available to campaigns now from nonvoters, corruption throughout our Federal government ranks (elected and administrative) is rampant. Couple that with a Federal Reserve that is clearly responsible to the money industries and not the American people, and the former American way of life is quickly becoming nothing more than history.

      That is the question, Cliff – unfortunately, not many citizens are asking it….

    3. We have no governing representatives in Washington ….. because there is no legitimate federal power in Washington.

      Simple fact: A police investigation says that Obama is using false documents.

      Simple fact 2: By definition, a president can’t be an undocumented worker.

      The legislative branch have been advised of the undocumented worker in the White House but they refuse to act. Many in the judiciary know but they refure to act.

      The only conclusion is that the legislative and judicial branches are complicit in this crime against our country ……. or there has been a silent coup.

Comments are closed.